Own Luxury Homes®
NAR Settlement Impact on Sellers: Should You Still Pay the Buyer's Agent?
NAR settlement seller impact: sellers can still offer buyer agent compensation as a seller concession in the purchase contract — just not on MLS. Not offering may reduce buyer pool, especially first-time buyers who can't pay agent fees in addition to down payment ($5K-$15K+). Fannie/Freddie: seller-paid buyer agent fees don't count against IPC limits. Strategic calculation: offering 2-2.5% concession may attract more and better offers. FSBO sellers who offer no representation: median $360K vs $425K (NAR 2025). Own Luxury Homes® 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™.
NAR Settlement Impact on Sellers: Should You Still Pay the Buyer's Agent?
The NAR settlement gave sellers a choice they technically always had: whether to offer buyer's agent compensation. Now that choice is explicit rather than assumed. Here is the strategic framework.
What Actually Changed for Sellers
Before August 17, 2024: sellers' agents typically offered buyer-side compensation in the MLS (historically 2.5–3%). Buyer agents could see this before showing the listing. The practice was so universal it felt like a requirement, though it was always technically negotiable. After August 17, 2024: MLS databases no longer display buyer agent compensation. Sellers cannot pre-advertise that they will cover buyer agent fees on the MLS. However, sellers can — and very frequently do — offer buyer agent compensation as a seller concession in the purchase contract. Many sellers include language in the MLS listing remarks section indicating a seller concession is available, though the specific amount can no longer be in a dedicated compensation field.
The Strategic Case for Still Offering Compensation
Most sellers still offer to cover buyer agent fees, and there is a clear strategic reason: it expands the buyer pool. Consider a first-time buyer with $30,000 saved for a down payment on a $400,000 home. They need that money for their down payment and closing costs. If they must additionally pay their buyer's agent $8,000–12,000 out of pocket, many simply cannot make the purchase work financially. By declining to offer buyer agent compensation, a seller potentially eliminates all buyers in that position from their offer pool. In most markets, the buyers most likely to pay the highest price are the ones with the strongest financing, highest motivation, and clearest decision-making — and this cohort often includes buyers who need the seller to cover agent fees. Sellers who decline to offer compensation often find themselves with fewer, not better, offers. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac confirmed in 2024 that seller-paid buyer broker compensation, when consistent with local market custom, does not count against Interested Party Contribution (IPC) limits for conventional loans. This means the seller can offer the concession without it being treated as a financial sweetener that triggers IPC caps.
When Sellers Might Choose Not to Offer Compensation
There are specific scenarios where declining to offer buyer agent compensation can make strategic sense: (1) In extremely hot seller's markets with dramatically limited inventory and multiple competing cash buyers who don't need financing considerations. (2) When selling to a highly specific buyer type (developers, investors) who are more likely to pay their own agent. (3) When price point and buyer profile make out-of-pocket agent fees a non-issue for likely buyers (ultra-luxury market). For most sellers in most markets, the risk of reduced buyer traffic and lower offers outweighs the ~2-3% savings from not offering buyer agent compensation. The calculation is not "save $10,000 in agent fees" — it is "risk getting $20,000 less for the home due to fewer competing offers."
“When sellers ask me about the NAR settlement and whether they should stop paying buyer's agents, I walk them through the math. If not offering that concession reduces my offer pool by 30% and one of those absent buyers would have pushed the price $15,000 higher in a multiple-offer situation, the calculation is negative. The commission concession is a marketing tool as much as a fee. In most markets at most price points, I recommend sellers continue to offer a buyer agent concession because the alternative is a smaller, less competitive offer pool. That said, the exact amount is now explicitly negotiable, and there are legitimate discussions to have about market conditions and strategy.”
— Ryan Brown, Principal Broker & CEO, Own Luxury Homes®
Should sellers offer to pay buyer's agent after the NAR settlement?
In most markets at most price points, yes — for strategic reasons. Offering buyer agent compensation as a seller concession (which is still allowed, just not via MLS advertising) expands the buyer pool to include buyers who cannot afford to pay their agent in addition to a down payment and closing costs. Sellers who decline often receive fewer offers and potentially lower prices. The Fannie/Freddie confirmation that seller-paid buyer agent fees don't count against IPC limits removes one obstacle to continuing the practice.
How much should sellers offer for buyer agent compensation post-NAR?
There is no requirement to offer any specific amount. Historically, 2.5–3% was standard. In markets where buyer agent compensation has declined post-settlement, sellers are offering 2-2.5%. The strategic question is: what amount attracts buyers without unnecessarily reducing net proceeds? In most markets, offering 2-2.5% of the purchase price as a buyer agent concession is the current competitive range. Discuss with your listing agent what the current market expectation is in your specific area.
Own Luxury Homes® — transparent compensation on every transaction. 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™. Talk to a specialist ›
"The introduction Own Luxury Homes® makes is to a specialist with documented closing history in your specific market — not the county, not the metro, the submarket you're actually selling or buying in. That's the standard we verify before your name goes anywhere."
— Ryan Brown, Principal Broker & CEO, Own Luxury Homes® (FL License BK3626873)