Own Luxury Homes®
Which Luxury Markets Are Adopting Mansion and Transfer Taxes Next
Mansion tax spread: 17 cities now have progressive transfer taxes, up from 6. Boston is the most likely near-term adopter. Chicago rejected its version in 2024. Texas, Florida, Nevada are most structurally resistant. Own Luxury Homes® 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™ — multi-market specialists who factor the full tax landscape in.
Home — Mansion & Transfer Tax Hub — What Markets Are Adopting Mansion Tax Next
Which Luxury Markets Are Adopting Mansion and Transfer Taxes Next: The Forward-Looking Guide
17
Cities with progressive real estate transfer taxes, up from 6 over the prior 40 years
2026
Year the CBPP explicitly called for more states to adopt mansion taxes in legislative sessions
Boston
Massachusetts cities are actively watching the trend after Chicago’s failed attempt
Repeal
Chicago voters rejected their version in 2024 — the trend is not inevitable everywhere
The spread of mansion and transfer taxes to new luxury markets is one of the most consequential long-term trends for UHNW buyers making ten-year hold decisions. A property purchased in a transfer-tax-free market today may not remain in one over the life of the investment. Understanding which markets are most likely to adopt these levies — and which have structural reasons to resist them — is a meaningful input into any multi-market portfolio strategy.
Own Luxury Homes® — 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™
Own Luxury Homes® verifies every luxury specialist through our 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™: documented experience navigating transfer tax structure, threshold negotiation, and market-jurisdiction strategy for multi-market UHNW buyers and sellers. No dual agency. Full representation. Assign a specialist now.
Why Cities Are Adopting Mansion Taxes Now
The primary driver is affordable housing revenue. Cities with severe housing affordability crises and limited ability to raise other taxes have found luxury transfer taxes politically palatable because they fall on a small number of high-value transactions and can be framed as making wealthy property owners pay their share. LA’s ULA has raised over $1 billion in cumulative revenue despite generating far less than projected. That revenue argument is compelling to other city councils facing housing shortfalls.
Markets Most Likely to Adopt in the Near Term
Boston and Massachusetts Cities
Massachusetts cities have been actively studying luxury transfer taxes since Chicago’s proposal and LA’s implementation generated national attention. Boston’s luxury condo market, Brookline, Cambridge, and Somerville have all been mentioned in local housing policy discussions. Massachusetts state law currently limits local transfer taxes, so adoption would require either state legislative action or a Home Rule petition. This is the market to watch most closely after LA and NYC.
California Cities Beyond Los Angeles
Several California cities have expressed interest in ULA-style levies for their own housing programs. A statewide proposition that would restrict municipal transfer taxes has been discussed, which could either prevent further California city adoptions or accelerate them before any restriction takes effect. San Francisco has historically used transfer tax aggressively; further increases there are possible.
Pacific Northwest: Portland and Bellingham
Oregon and Washington have been receptive to progressive tax structures for housing programs. Portland and other Oregon cities with housing affordability pressure have been watching the LA model closely. Washington State already has a graduated REET; further escalation at the high end is politically feasible.
Markets That Rejected the Trend — and Why
Chicago: The Cautionary Tale
Chicago’s “Bring Chicago Home” ballot measure was rejected by 53% of voters in March 2024. The proposal would have taxed properties above $1M at 2% and above $1.5M at 3%. Voters rejected it citing confusion about the spending specifics, concern about impact on commercial real estate, and skepticism about city government stewardship of the revenue. The failure demonstrates that the trend is not inevitable — voter approval requirements and political opposition can stop these measures.
Structurally Resistant Markets
Texas, Florida, and Nevada have structural and political features that make mansion or transfer tax adoption significantly less likely than in coastal blue cities. Texas has no state income tax and a constitutional culture of resistance to property-related levies. Florida’s legislature is broadly resistant to new taxes and has shown no appetite for ULA-style proposals. Nevada’s legislature is similarly resistant. These markets are not permanently immune — political majorities shift and housing crises create pressure — but they are the most resistant near-term.
| Market | Adoption Probability (Near Term) | Key Factor | What to Watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston / Massachusetts cities | High | Active legislative study; housing crisis; political will | State Home Rule petitions; state legislative session |
| Additional California cities | Moderate-high | LA precedent; housing pressure; but statewide preemption possible | Statewide proposition that would limit municipal transfer taxes |
| Portland / Oregon cities | Moderate | Progressive political environment; housing affordability crisis | Oregon legislature; city council housing packages |
| Seattle / Washington cities | Moderate | Washington REET already exists; increases at high end possible | State legislature; further REET escalation at $6M+ |
| Texas / Florida / Nevada | Low | Constitutional culture; legislative resistance; no-tax branding | Major political shift required; watch over 10+ year horizon |
Probability assessments are qualitative and based on current political environment. Tax policy is subject to rapid change.
Ryan Brown, Principal Broker & CEO — Own Luxury Homes®
“A client buying in Austin or Miami today is buying in a no-transfer-tax market. A client buying in Boston or Portland is buying in a market where a ULA-style levy is being actively discussed. I factor that probability into any long-hold strategy conversation. It does not change the decision in most cases, but it is part of the picture — and a luxury buyer who has not heard it from their agent has not gotten the full analysis.”
Is the mansion tax trend spreading to new cities?
Yes. Seventeen cities now have progressive real estate transfer taxes, up from six over the previous four decades. Boston and Massachusetts cities are the most likely near-term adopters. Chicago’s 2024 rejection shows the trend is not inevitable everywhere.
Which luxury markets are safest from mansion tax adoption?
Texas, Florida, and Nevada have the strongest structural and political resistance to mansion or transfer taxes near-term. They are not permanently immune, but they are the lowest-risk markets in the current environment for a buyer focused on transfer tax exposure.
Should the risk of future mansion tax adoption affect where I buy luxury real estate?
It is a relevant input in a long-hold analysis, not the primary decision driver. A ten-year hold in Boston should factor in a meaningful probability of transfer tax adoption. A five-year hold in Miami should acknowledge the risk but not prioritize it. Your specialist can help model the tax scenarios alongside the market fundamentals.
Own Luxury Homes® — Multi-market specialists who factor the full tax landscape into your portfolio strategy. 12-Point Agent Integrity Audit™. No dual agency. Find your specialist now ›
"The introduction Own Luxury Homes® makes is to a specialist with documented closing history in your specific market — not the county, not the metro, the submarket you're actually selling or buying in. That's the standard we verify before your name goes anywhere."
— Ryan Brown, Principal Broker & CEO, Own Luxury Homes® (FL License BK3626873)